|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
In this provocative paper, Michele Boldrin and David K. Levine question
the fundamental assumptions underlying the economic theory used to support
intellectual property systems.
|
|
|
|
Do "stronger"
patents increase innovation? Josh Lerner conducts an extensive investigation
of the impact of pro-patent-holder policy changes on rates of patenting
and finds surprising results.
|
|
|
|
Bronwyn H. Hall provides
a review of recent research, both theoretical and empirical, on the
economic effects of the patent system. She does this to evaluate the
likely effect of the recent U.S. extension of patent protection to business
methods.
|
|
 |
|
A key issue in evaluating
the economic effect of patents is the measurement of patent quality. Evidence
suggests that many patents are worth very little, but that a few are very
valuable. Jean O. Lanjouw and Mark Schankerman look at one way of measuring
patent quality. They examine the characteristics of those patents that
firms find valuable enough to renew and to protect in court.
|
|
 |
|
Dominique Guellec and Bruno
van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie look at the same problem from a different
angle. They explore the characteristics of patent applications that
are associated with the probability that a patent will be granted (by
the European Patent Office).
These should be better quality inventions.
|
|
 |
|
The next TIIP
newsletter will be a special issue containing invited articles by leading
researchers on "Patents, Pharmaceutical and the Third World."
--James Bessen, Editor
|
 |
 |